MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087092418 · doi:10.5081/jgps.1.1.18

Precise Ionosphere Modeling Using Regional GPS Network Data

2002· article· en· W2087092418 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Global Positioning Systems · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobal Positioning SystemIonosphereGeodesyComputer scienceGeographyGeologyTelecommunicationsGeophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The ionosphere affects the electromagnetic waves that pass through it by inducing an additional transmission time delay. The ionosphere influence has now become the largest error source in GPS positioning and navigation after the turn-off of the Selective Availability (SA). In this paper, methods of 2D grid-based and 3D tomography-based ionospheric modeling are developed based on regional GPS reference networks. Performance analysis was conducted using data from two different regional GPS reference networks. The modeling accuracy of the vertical TEC (VTEC) is at the level of several TECU for 2D ionospheric modeling and about one TECU for 3D tomographic modeling after a comparison to independent ionospheric map data or directly measured ionospsheric TEC values. The data analysis has indicated that the modeling accuracy based on the 3D tomography method is much higher than the 2D grid-based approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.639
Threshold uncertainty score0.713

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it