MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087330011 · doi:10.1177/0001699310365632

A Comparative Political Economy of Rural Capitalism

2010· article· en· W2087330011 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Sociologica · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRural development and sustainability
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
FundersCurtin University of TechnologySt. Francis Xavier University
KeywordsCapitalismIndustrialisationEconomic democracyRedistribution (election)PoliticsDemocracyEconomicsCapital (architecture)Neoliberalism (international relations)Political economyDevelopment economicsPolitical scienceMarket economyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article draws from field research conducted from 1993 to 2003 examining the impact of political regimes and economic globalization on the development of salmon aquaculture in Norway, Chile and Ireland. Norway underwent salmon aquaculture industrialization under the auspices of social democracy, whereas Chile and Ireland did so through the influence of neoliberalism. Social democracy imposes limits on the economic and geographical concentration of capital, whereas neo-liberalism facilitates the economic and geographical concentration of capital. This is because social democracy uses salmon aquaculture to foster the redistribution of benefits, whereas neo-liberalism uses salmon aquaculture to foster economic growth. Nevertheless, some evidence shows the strength of regional development interests in containing the full brunt of neo-liberalism in rural Ireland. The article concludes with suggestions for deepening the comparative political economy discussion of rural capitalism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it