MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087466987

Automated Collection of Pedestrian Data Using Computer Vision Techniques

2009· article· en· W2087466987 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karim Aldin Samir Ismail, Tarek Sayed, Nicolas Saunier

Bibliographic record

VenuePolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPedestrianComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionPedestrian detectionFeature (linguistics)Data collectionVideo trackingField (mathematics)Frame (networking)Object (grammar)Transport engineeringEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pedestrian data collection is critical for the planning and design of pedestrian facilities. Most pedestrian data collection efforts involve field observations or observer-based video analysis. These manual observations are time consuming, limited in coverage, resource intensive and error prone. Automated video analysis which involves the use of computer vision techniques can overcome many of these shortcomings. Despite advances in the field of computer vision applications for pedestrian detection and tracking, the technical literature shows little use of these techniques in pedestrian data collection practices. The likely reasons are the technical complexities that surround the processing of pedestrian videos. To extract pedestrian trajectories automatically from video, all road users must be detected, tracked at each frame and classified by type, at least as pedestrians and non-pedestrians. This is a challenging task in busy open outdoor urban environment. Common problems include global illumination variations, multiple object tracking and shadow handling. Specific problems arise when dealing with pedestrians because of their complex movement dynamics, varied appearance and non-rigid nature. The main objective of this study is to present a system for automated collection of pedestrian walking speed using computer vision techniques. The system is based on a previously developed feature-based tracking system for vehicles which was significantly modified to adapt to the particularities of pedestrian movement and to discriminate pedestrian and motorized traffic. The system was tested on real video data collected at Downtown area of Vancouver, British Columbia. This study is unique in so far as it tests the system under a variety of daylight conditions, crowd densities, movement context, and the video analysis approach. Promising results were obtained and several conclusions were drawn using statistical analysis of the automatically extracted pedestrian trajectories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal)Same topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207