MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2087659418 · doi:10.4271/2013-01-0010

Effects of Single and Double Post Injections on Diesel PCCI Combustion

2013· article· en· W2087659418 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombustionAutomotive engineeringDiesel fuelDiesel engineHomogeneous charge compression ignitionMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceEngineeringCombustion chamberChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">In this study, single and double post injections were applied to diesel premixed charge compression ignition (PCCI) combustion to overcome the drawbacks those are high level of hydrocarbons (HC) and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions in a single-cylinder direct-injection diesel engine. The operating conditions including engine speed and total injection quantity were 1200 rpm and 12 mg/cycle, which are the representative of low engine speed and low load. The main injection timing of diesel PCCI combustion was set to 28 crank angle degree before top dead center (CAD BTDC). This main injection timing showed 32% lower level of nitric oxides (NOx) level and 8 CAD longer ignition delay than those of conventional diesel combustion. However, the levels of HC and CO were 2.7 and 3 times higher than those of conventional diesel combustion due to over-lean mixture and wall wetting of fuel. The efficiency of PCCI combustion was also 13% lower than that of conventional combustion under single injection and no EGR conditions due to the advanced combustion phase. With fixing of the main injection timing, single and double post injections were applied with exhaust gas recirculation (EGR). The quantity of single post injection was varied from 10 % to 30 % of the total injected fuel. For double post injections, the quantity of each post injection was set to 10 % or 15 % of the total injected fuel with various post injection timings. The applying of single and double post injections resulted in a significant reduction in HC and CO compared with main injection only because the combustion by post injection helped to combust unburned species completely, and double post injection was more effective to reduce these unburned species due to shortened spray penetration distance by split of post injection. However, the level of NOx emissions was increased because the combustion by post injection occurred under high ambient pressure and temperature. For the reduction of increased NOx emissions, the post injection timing was required to be retarded more than 30 CAD after start of main injection (ASOI). Under various EGR rates, the application of single and double post injections was effective to improve the trade-off relationship between NOx and HC, CO emissions. Thus, it was possible that low NOx level with lowered level of HC and CO emissions was maintained compared to the combustion with main injection only.</div></div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it