MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088167289 · doi:10.1093/qjmam/hbp021

Elastodynamic Equations: Characteristics, Wavefronts and Rays

2009· article· en· W2088167289 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic and Geometric Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWavefrontMathematicsMathematical analysisChristoffel symbolsConverseLimit (mathematics)Wave equationPhysicsGeometryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We derive the characteristic equations, and the so-called Christoffel equation, for the vector elastodynamic equations in terms of both hypersurfaces of nonuniqueness and as wavefronts based on a physical definition. We follow Courant and Hilbert in defining a wavefront as a surface for which a solution may be zero on one side but nonzero on the other. We show that wavefronts defined in this way must be characteristics. Moreover, we give a partial converse showing that in the case of analytic coefficients, characteristics must (locally) be wavefronts. Furthermore, we show how the equations defining wavefronts, which are characteristics, can be obtained by letting frequency tend to infinity in a certain trial solution expressed in the frequency domain. The last approach might suggest that ray theory, which results from the Christoffel equation, is an asymptotic theory. Taking the limit, however, is just a technicality and is unnecessary to obtain the Christoffel equation, which is contained in the elastodynamic equations and their characteristic equations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it