MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088445839 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2012.6334869

Modeling aircraft jet engine and system identification by using Genetic Programming

2012· article· en· W2088445839 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJet engineGenetic programmingIdentification (biology)Jet (fluid)Automotive engineeringGas turbinesSoftwareSearch engineComputer scienceEngineeringAerospace engineeringMechanical engineeringArtificial intelligenceInformation retrieval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a new approach for discovering an aircraft jet engine model is proposed by using system identification and Genetic Programming (GP). The relationship between the engine Exhaust Gas Temperature (EGT), as a major indicator of the engine health condition, and other engine parameters and operating conditions corresponding to different phases of the flight is modelled by using GP technique. Toward this end, flight characteristics are divided into several phases such as the take off and the cruise. The GP scheme is then used to discover the structure of the interrelations among engine parameters. This approach provides an effective strategy to estimate the aircraft jet engine EGT without requiring any specific information on the internal engine model and characteristics. The performance of the proposed algorithm is demonstrated by applying it to a dual spool engine data that is generated by using the Gas turbine Simulation Program (GSP) software.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207