Multiagent Reinforcement Learning for Integrated Network of Adaptive Traffic Signal Controllers (MARLIN-ATSC): Methodology and Large-Scale Application on Downtown Toronto
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Population is steadily increasing worldwide, resulting in intractable traffic congestion in dense urban areas. Adaptive traffic signal control (ATSC) has shown strong potential to effectively alleviate urban traffic congestion by adjusting signal timing plans in real time in response to traffic fluctuations to achieve desirable objectives (e.g., minimize delay). Efficient and robust ATSC can be designed using a multiagent reinforcement learning (MARL) approach in which each controller (agent) is responsible for the control of traffic lights around a single traffic junction. Applying MARL approaches to the ATSC problem is associated with a few challenges as agents typically react to changes in the environment at the individual level, but the overall behavior of all agents may not be optimal. This paper presents the development and evaluation of a novel system of multiagent reinforcement learning for integrated network of adaptive traffic signal controllers (MARLIN-ATSC). MARLIN-ATSC offers two possible modes: 1) independent mode, where each intersection controller works independently of other agents; and 2) integrated mode, where each controller coordinates signal control actions with neighboring intersections. MARLIN-ATSC is tested on a large-scale simulated network of 59 intersections in the lower downtown core of the City of Toronto, ON, Canada, for the morning rush hour. The results show unprecedented reduction in the average intersection delay ranging from 27% in mode 1 to 39% in mode 2 at the network level and travel-time savings of 15% in mode 1 and 26% in mode 2, along the busiest routes in Downtown Toronto.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".