The right time and the left time: Spatial associations of temporal cues affect target detection in right brain-damaged patients
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Humans map timewords such as "yesterday" or "future" onto a mental timeline that holds temporally earlier events on the left side of space and temporally later events on the right side. The perception of time and spatial mapping both are partially subserved by right temporo-parietal brain regions. We tested stroke patients with right-hemisphere lesions on a spatio-temporal cueing task to see whether spatial associations of noninformative temporal cues would elicit the same cognitive deficits as do typical stimulus-driven exogenous cues. While our right brain-damaged patients were able to maintain a mental timeline with words referring to the past sitting to the left and words referring to the future sitting to the right, we also observed that the typical deficit in disengaging from incongruently cued locations persists for noninformative cues that are mapped onto a mental spatial continuum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it