The ACS Virgo Cluster Survey. VIII. The Nuclei of Early‐Type Galaxies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ACS Virgo Cluster Survey is a Hubble Space Telescope program to obtain high-resolution imaging in widely separated bandpasses (F475W ≈ g and F850LP ≈ z ) for 100 early-type members of the Virgo Cluster, spanning a range of ≈460 in blue luminosity. We use this large, homogenous data set to examine the innermost structure of these galaxies and to characterize the properties of their compact central nuclei. We present a sharp upward revision in the frequency of nucleation in early-type galaxies brighter than M B ≈ -15 (66% ≲ f n ≲ 82%) and show that ground-based surveys underestimated the number of nuclei due to surface brightness selection effects, limited sensitivity and poor spatial resolution. We speculate that previously reported claims that nucleated dwarfs are more concentrated toward the center of Virgo than their nonnucleated counterparts may be an artifact of these selection effects. There is no clear evidence from the properties of the nuclei, or from the overall incidence of nucleation, for a change at M B ~ -17.6, the traditional dividing point between dwarf and giant galaxies. There does, however, appear to be a fundamental transition at M B ~ -20.5, in the sense that the brighter, "core-Sérsic" galaxies lack resolved (stellar) nuclei. A search for nuclei that may be offset from the photocenters of their host galaxies reveals only five candidates with displacements of more than 0 5, all of which are in dwarf galaxies. In each case, however, the evidence suggests that these "nuclei" are, in fact, globular clusters projected close to the galaxy photocenter. Working from a sample of 51 galaxies with prominent nuclei, we find a median half-light radius of ⟨ r h ⟩ = 4.2 pc, with the sizes of individual nuclei ranging from 62 pc down to ≤2 pc (i.e., unresolved in our images) in about a half-dozen cases. Excluding these unresolved objects, the nuclei sizes are found to depend on nuclear luminosity according to the relation r h ∝ 0.50±0.03 . Because the large majority of nuclei are resolved, we can rule out low-level AGNs as an explanation for the central luminosity excess in almost all cases. On average, the nuclei are ≈3.5 mag brighter than a typical globular cluster. Based on their broadband colors, the nuclei appear to have old to intermediate age stellar populations. The colors of the nuclei in galaxies fainter than M B ≈ -17.6 are tightly correlated with their luminosities, and less so with the luminosities of their host galaxies, suggesting that their chemical enrichment histories were governed by local or internal factors. Comparing the nuclei to the "nuclear clusters" found in late-type spiral galaxies reveals a close match in terms of size, luminosity, and overall frequency. A formation mechanism that is rather insensitive to the detailed properties of the host galaxy properties is required to explain this ubiquity and homogeneity. The mean of the frequency function for the nucleus-to-galaxy luminosity ratio in our nucleated galaxies, ⟨log η⟩ = -2.49 ± 0.09 dex (σ = 0.59 ± 0.10), is indistinguishable from that of the SBH-to-bulge mass ratio, ⟨log( • / gal )⟩ = -2.61 ± 0.07 dex (σ = 0.45 ± 0.09), calculated in 23 early-type galaxies with detected supermassive black holes (SBHs). We argue that the compact stellar nuclei found in many of our program galaxies are the low-mass counterparts of the SBHs detected in the bright galaxies. If this interpretation is correct, then one should think in terms of "central massive objects"—either SBHs or compact stellar nuclei—that accompany the formation of almost all early-type galaxies and contain a mean fraction ≈0.3% of the total bulge mass. In this view, SBHs would be the dominant formation mode above M B ≈ -20.5.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.035 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".