MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089823793 · doi:10.1353/mod.2014.0095

Women and the History of Art by Annie Kevans, and: Annie Kevans: Women and the History of Art, Catalog by Annie Kevans (review)

2014· article· en· W2089823793 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueModernism/modernity · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionContemporary artArt historyPaintingHistory of artModern artArt worldPortraitArtVisual artsPerformance artArchitecture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Women and the History of Artby Annie Kevans, and: Annie Kevans: Women and the History of Art, Catalogby Annie Kevans Chanin Eileen Women and the History of Art. Annie Kevans. The Fine Art Society Contemporary, London, May 13-June 6, 2014. Annie Kevans: Women and the History of Art, Catalog. London: The Fine Art Society Contemporary, 2014. Pp. 39. $00.00 (paper). The Fine Art Society’s galleries, located on London’s New Bond Street, have held a number of exhibitions that have made history in the art world. Since the society’s establishment in 1876, it has showcased the works of prominent artists of the English school, including Sir John Everett Millais, John Singer Sargent, Burne-Jones, Frank Brangwyn, Sickert, and Walter Crane. As such, this establishment has played an important role in fostering an audience for local artists. The 2005 refurbishment of the premises opened a new gallery space designated specifically for contemporary art shows. Here, London-based painter Annie Kevans (b. 1972) exhibited portraits of what she calls “successful female artists over the last 500 years, many of whom have been all but written out of art history.” 1Publicity for the exhibition suggested that Kevans may be a rising star in the British art world. Across town, in the City of London’s Barbican Art Gallery, another series of works commissioned from Kevans was seen as part of the concurrent exhibition, The Fashion World of Jean Gaultier: From the Sidewalk to the Catwalk. This Gaultier exhibition was conceived by the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts in Toronto and, before coming to London, was shown in New York, Rotterdam, and Stockholm. Next, it tours to the National Galleries of Victoria in Melbourne (October 17, 2014-February 8, 2015) and Galeries Nationales du Grand Palais in Paris (April 1-August 3, 2015). Exhibition curator and former model, Thierry-Maxime Loriot, was impressed by Kevans’s series All the Presidents’ Girls(2009), which depicted the mistresses of U.S. presidents. After seeing these exhibited in New York, he asked her to create portraits depicting Gaultier’s muses and inspirations, from Gaultier’s grandmother to artists like David Bowie and Boy George. [End Page 1025] Born in France to British parents, Kevans graduated from Central Saint Martins School of Art and Design (University of the Arts London) in 2004. She first became known when all thirty paintings from her BA degree show, the Boysseries, were bought by Charles Saatchi. Her thesis was on images of children in art, and Boysportrayed the faces (some based on existing portraits and others invented) of twentieth-century tyrants, dictators, and war criminals, including Hitler, Pol Pot, and Radovan Karadzic, as children. She painted the portraits in thinned oil paints, cultivating a technique that has become a hallmark of her work so far. Adopting a limited monochromatic palette, she applied the paint with deft brushstrokes, drawn sketchily on paper primed specifically for oil paint. The portraits have a washed-out appearance: “a melancholic, dreamlike feel—all eerie wide eyes, drippy hair and smeary lips,” The Independent has observed. 2 Childhood is usually seen as a time of innocence, but Kevans matches it with evil in these portraits. They originally sprang from Kevans’s interest in the relation between power and identity, in how truth is manipulated in the recording of history, and in how history is recast. These works pose questions about how history and memory relate to the composition of (artistic and/or documentary) images. This is a thread that continues to run through Kevans’s work. She paints figures whom she regards as being overlooked, exploited, or objectified in history or contemporary culture. Her works are a composite of existing images, research, and imagination. Her “portraits” may or may not be based on real documentation, and she has been criticized for painting portraits in such a loose sense, with many of them largely fictional. Kevans herself believes that “a person’s identity is not preset but is a shifting temporary construction,” and her work “questions our verdicts on history and perceptions of intellectual solidity.” The Women and the History of Artseries consists of thirty-two portraits...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it