MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090327103 · doi:10.2118/78146-pa

Application of a New Multicomponent Gas Adsorption Model to Coal Gas Adsorption Systems

2003· article· en· W2090327103 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsARC Resources (Canada)
FundersOklahoma State University
KeywordsAdsorptionThermodynamicsVacancy defectBinary numberTernary operationBinary systemChemistryMethaneComponent (thermodynamics)Phase (matter)Materials sciencePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary A new multicomponent adsorption model is proposed for application to coal gas adsorption systems. The model is derived by combining the vacancy solution and Dubinin-Polanyi theories. Applications of the new adsorption model include the modeling of multicomponent adsorption processes associated with primary and enhanced coalbed methane recovery (ECBM). In the new model, the adsorbed phase in the single-component (pure) adsorption system is treated as a binary mixture of a singlecomponent gas with a hypothetical "vacancy" species, which also occupies adsorption space. The adsorption system is modeled as equilibrium between the gaseous phase and the adsorbed-phase vacancy solution. The Dubinin-Astakhov (D-A) equation is used to generate activity coefficients, as a function of the degree of porefilling, for the pure component gas in the binary (adsorbate+vacancy) adsorbed-phase mixture. The Wilson equation is chosen to fit pure component (D-A-derived) activity coefficient curves by optimizing the binary interaction coefficients. These binary interaction coefficients are then used to predict multicomponent adsorption equilibrium, although only the case of binary adsorption is modeled here. The adsorbed phase mixture for binary gas adsorption is treated as a ternary mixture of the two pure component adsorbates and the hypothetical vacancy species. Binary gas adsorption equilibrium is described by equilibrium between the gaseous components and the components in the adsorbed phase solution. Adsorbed-phase activity coefficients are calculated from the Wilson equation, with the binary interaction coefficients obtained from pure component adsorption data. Thus, only pure component adsorption data are required to make binary and multicomponent adsorption predictions with the new model. Two binary (CH4+CO2) gas adsorption experimental data sets with coal as the adsorbent and one binary (CH4+C2H6) gas adsorption data set with activated carbon as the adsorbent are used to test the predictions of the new model. In most cases the new model is able to predict binary gas adsorption accurately. The poor fit of the Wilson equation to the D-A-derived activity coefficients for some pure component data suggests that some improvement in model predictions could be made with the choice of a different activity coefficient equation. A unique feature of the current model is the ability to predict multicomponent gas adsorption at different temperatures from the pure component adsorption data collected at a single temperature. The temperature independence of pure component "characteristic" curves, as demonstrated in Dubinin-Polanyi theory, allows pure component adsorption to be predicted for a range of temperatures. These pure component data can then be used in modeling binary or multicomponent adsorption data at various temperatures. This is demonstrated for one experimental binary gas adsorption data set.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.462
Threshold uncertainty score0.602

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it