MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090440575 · doi:10.1623/hysj.54.1.29

Analysis of annual hydrological droughts: the case of northwest Ontario, Canada

2009· article· en· W2090440575 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueHydrological Sciences Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsClimatologyGeographyEnvironmental sciencePhysical geographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Two important parameters of hydrological droughts are the longest duration and the greatest severity (in standardized form) over a desired return period (say T years), referred to as critical drought. The long-term mean of the annual flow sequences has been used as the truncation level for defining hydrological drought. Two well-known approaches—time series simulation and a probability theory-based approach—were used to estimate drought parameters. The drought episodes are treated as runs of deficits, and so the theory of runs forms a major tool for analysis. The sample estimates of the mean, coefficient of variation (or standard deviation), skewness, lag-1 serial correlation, and/or information on the probability distribution of flow sequences, are the basic input parameters in both approaches. The applicability of both approaches was tested for deducing drought parameters across Canada, with emphasis on northwest Ontario, a region bordering Lake Superior. Natural annual flow sequences in this region can be treated as normal independent sequences in the stochastic sense. The results of the probabilistic approach yielded marginally better results than the simulation approach. A main advantage of the probabilistic approach turned out to be parsimony with only two parameters, viz. drought probability at the truncation level and return period for normal independent annual flow sequences. Furthermore, estimates of the greatest standardized severity can be taken as equal to the longest duration, thus eliminating the need for severity analysis. The regional variation of droughts in northwest Ontario was portrayed through a map plotting the values of drought potential index (DPI). In northwest Ontario, a 100-year drought may persist continuously for 6 years and a 25-year drought for 4 years. The DPI map indicated proneness to drought along the Ontario—Manitoba border in the northwest Ontario region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.301
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it