MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090462632 · doi:10.1115/1.2907393

Parameter Estimation Using a Combined Variable Structure and Kalman Filtering Approach

2008· article· en· W2090462632 on OpenAlexaff
Saeid Habibi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtended Kalman filterRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceKalman filterParametric statisticsControl theory (sociology)Artificial neural networkEstimation theoryAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method that is often used for parameter estimation is the extended Kalman filter (EKF). EKF is a model-based strategy that implicitly considers the effect of modeling uncertainties. This implicit consideration often leads to the tuning of the filter by trial and error. When formulated for parameter estimation, the “tuned” EKF becomes sensitive to uncertainties in its internal model. The EKF’s robustness can be improved by combining it with the recently proposed variable structure filter (VSF) concept. In a combined form, the modeling uncertainties no longer affect stability, but impact the performance and the quality of the estimation process. Furthermore, the VSF concept provides a secondary set of indicators of performance that is in addition to the estimation error and that pertains to the range of parametric uncertainties. As such, the robustness of the combined method and its multiple indicators of performance allow the use of intelligent adaptation for improving the performance of the estimation process. For real-time applications, online neural network adaptation may be used to improve the performance by progressively reducing specific modeling uncertainties in the system. In this paper, a new parameter estimation method that uses concepts associated with the EKF, the VSF, and neural network adaptation is introduced. The performance of this method is considered and discussed for applications that involve parameter estimation such as fault detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and ControlSame topicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207