MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090510513 · doi:10.1109/ispcs.2014.6948530

A recursive method for bias estimation in asymmetric packet-based networks

2014· article· en· W2090510513 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Time Synchronization Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSynchronization (alternating current)Clock synchronizationNetwork packetClock driftOffset (computer science)Master/slaveNode (physics)Real-time computingTransmission delayProcess (computing)Computer networkParallel computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clock synchronization in many protocols such as IEEE 1588 is achieved by exchanging timing information between a master and slave node. Packet delay variation (PDV) is a major source of inaccuracy in packet-based synchronization systems. When the expected values of the delays from master to slave and from slave to master are not equal, the synchronization problem can be modeled as a biased estimation problem. In this paper we propose a solution to estimate the delay bias and use this estimate to improve the synchronization accuracy. Our method is easy to implement and is compatible with the current version of the protocol. Moreover, this method allows us to update the slave clock recursively rather than after collecting many samples. The proposed method works well in the presence of frequency offset and does not require any assumption on the filter which is used in the synchronization process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.748
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it