MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Detection and decay of the <i>Bt</i> endotoxin in soil from a field trial with genetically modified maize

2003· article· en· W2090586830 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Soil Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersRoyal Society of Edinburgh
KeywordsBacillus thuringiensisFraction (chemistry)ChemistryToxinSoil testAgronomySoil waterBiologyBacteriaChromatographyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Genetically modified plants and their residues may have direct effects on ecosystem processes. We aimed to determine the amount in soil of the insecticidal δ‐endotoxin, originally from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis , introduced into soil by root exudates and residues from genetically modified maize, to compare the short‐term rates of decay of Bt ‐maize and non‐ Bt ‐maize, and to determine the rate at which the toxin in Bt ‐maize leaves decomposes in soil. Intact soil, size fractions of soil, soluble fractions from soil and fractions of organic residues from a field where Bt ‐maize had been cultivated for 4 years were analysed for the Bt δ‐endotoxin. Traces of the δ‐endotoxin were detected in the whole (unfractionated) soil, the water‐soluble fractions, and some of the particle‐size fractions, but it was sufficiently concentrated only in the &gt; 2000‐µm size fraction to be quantified. The δ‐endotoxin concentrations in this fraction ranged between 0.4 and 4.4 ng toxin g −1 fraction, which equated to 70, 6 and 50 mg toxin m −2 in the 0–15, 15–30 and 30–60 cm depths, respectively (or 126 mg toxin m −2 over the 0–60 cm depth) in the field in June (early summer). The &gt; 2000‐µm size fraction was a mixture of light‐ and dark‐coloured organic material and mineral material comprising sand grains and stable aggregates. For samples collected early in the growing season, most of the detected δ‐endotoxin was present in the light‐coloured organic material, which was comprised of primarily live roots. However, recognizable maize residues, probably from previous years' crops, also contained δ‐endotoxin. In a laboratory incubation study, Bt‐ and non‐ Bt‐ maize residues were added to soil and incubated for 43 days. There was no detectable difference in the decomposition of plant material from the two lines of maize, as determined by CO 2 production. The quantity of δ‐endotoxin in the decomposing plant material and soil mixtures declined rapidly with time during the incubation, with none being detectable after 14 days. The rapid disappearance of the δ‐endotoxin occurred at a rate similar to that of the water‐soluble components of the maize residues. The results suggested that much of the δ‐endotoxin in crop residues is highly labile and quickly decomposes in soil, but that a small fraction may be protected from decay in relatively recalcitrant residues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.183

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it