MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090645595 · doi:10.1029/2001jc001020

North Atlantic Ocean surface currents

2003· article· en· W2090645595 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gilles Reverdin, Pearn P. Niiler, Héðinn Valdimarsson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOcean gyreGeologyBathymetryGulf StreamEddyOceanographyOcean currentRidgeCurrent (fluid)DrifterMid-Atlantic RidgeBoundary currentNorth Atlantic Deep WaterMeander (mathematics)ClimatologyThermohaline circulationSubtropicsPaleontologyGeographyMeteorologyTurbulenceLagrangianGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Close to 1800 surface drifters are used to investigate the 15 m circulation of the North Atlantic Ocean. The data are used to describe structures of the average Eulerian circulation and of the associated eddy variability. The data resolve scales on the order of 50 km, which have hitherto not been systematically described, in particular, near shelf breaks and near the most intense currents, the Gulf Stream, the North Atlantic Current (NAC), and the frontal currents of the subpolar gyre. This reveals a complex series of quasi‐permanent eddies, meanders, and recirculation patterns. Gulf Stream intensity is portrayed as changing abruptly near 54°W, east of which, it is identified as two current branches centered near 39° and 41.5°N, the northern one connecting more directly with the NAC, and the southern one with the recirculation gyre and the Azores Current (AC). Many features of the currents are controlled by topography, in particular, currents are often intensified near shelf breaks or parallel to ridges in the subpolar gyre. However, the largest northward branch of the NAC in the Icelandic basin is located near the deepest bathymetry, not near steep bathymetry. Other currents, in particular, in the subtropical gyre, are less clearly related to topography: for instance, the AC is featured as a zonal eastward current extending far west of the Mid‐Atlantic Ridge (MAR) to at least 55°W and possibly 63°W. In the interior and away from topographic features the eddy kinetic energy (EKE) is the largest where the mean currents are the largest. In the subpolar gyre, there are striking differences in EKE between southward flowing currents (the Labrador and east Greenland Current) and the northward flowing currents (west Greenland Current and branches of the NAC), which have higher EKE. The areas of weakest variability are located in the southwest part of the subpolar gyre, northeast of Iceland, and in the eastern Atlantic south of 45°N. The AC eddies and the mesoscales south of the Canary Islands transect this eastern eddy desert. Drifter trajectories are used as realizations of Lagrangian particles in the vicinity of current cores. These illustrate the variety of paths or connections between different current systems and demonstrate cross‐stream dispersions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations229
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207