Coastal Lagoons: Ecosystem Processes and Modelling for Sustainable Use and Development ‐ Edited by I Etham Gonenc and John P Wolfin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coastal Lagoons: Ecosystem Processes and Modelling for Sustainable Use and Development . Edited by I Etham Gonenc and John P Wolfin CRC Press , London , 2005 , 500 pp £74.99 ISBN 1 566 70686 6 This book deals with the material cycles in lagoon ecosystems. The first few chapters describe precisely the basic ideas behind the study of lagoon physical processes, ecology, and biogeochemical cycles. The tables of biogeochemical parameters and their references are very useful for researchers studying lagoons, especially for modellers. In later chapters some concrete examples of lagoon studies are described. These examples will give beginners an outline of procedures for lagoon research. In Chapter Two, a fundamental idea of lagoons, focusing on their role in material cycles, is shown. In Chapter Three, hydrodynamic equations together with diffusion are presented. Although the descriptions are rather difficult for beginners/undergraduate students, this chapter is a useful review for graduate students. In Chapter Four, equations for various processes among biological compartments are described. I believe this chapter is one of the highlights of this book, because it will be helpful to all modellers of lagoon ecosystems. Chapter Five reviews the response of plankton/benthos to environmental change. Chapter Six, which reviews modelling techniques and numerical schemes, is also useful as a text for graduate students. In Chapter Seven, the fundamental idea of monitoring design is described. Chapter Eight deals with the problem of decision-making. This idea is very important for the sustainable use of lagoons, although this chapter is too short to explain it in detail. Chapter Nine contains case studies from Canada, Spain, Russia, and Turkey. To my regret the models applied to the various sites are not the same, which makes comparisons difficult. However, these are good examples of simulations of lagoon ecosystems. Generally speaking, books like this one are apt to be only reports of large projects. However, this new book clearly goes beyond such a report in that it is useful as a textbook for students studying lagoon/coastal systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.049 | 0.022 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".