MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prediction of Friction Stir Processed AZ31 Magnesium Alloy Micro-Hardness Using Artificial Neural Networks

2014· article· en· W2090716491 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Welding Techniques Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFriction stir processingMaterials scienceMagnesium alloyArtificial neural networkMagnesiumMetallurgyAlloyMicrostructureDeformation (meteorology)Grain sizeIndentation hardnessExtrusionComposite materialComputer scienceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Friction stir processing (FSP) is a microstructural modification technique. In FSP, the material undergoes intense plastic deformation, yielding a dynamically recrystallized fine grain structure. One of the most important issues that need to be tackled in this field is the lack of predictive tools. That enables the selection of the optimum parameters required to achieve the desired modifications on the mechanical properties of the processed materials. In this study, the effects of different FSP parameters (rotational and translational speeds) on the resulting micro-hardness of friction stir processed AZ31 magnesium sheets are examined. Variations of micro-hardness with longitudinal and through-thickness positions are also investigated. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are used to model and predict the resulting micro-hardness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it