MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090746660 · doi:10.4141/p02-194

Plastic mulches and row covers for early and midseason crisphead lettuce produced on organic soils

2003· article· en· W2090746660 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicIrrigation Practices and Water Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsMulchAgronomyPlastic mulchSowingSoil waterLactucaHorticultureEnvironmental scienceBiologySoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plastic mulches and row covers for early and midseason crisphead lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. ‘Ithaca’) grown on organic soils were investigated over 2 yr. For early production, four mulch treatments (infrared transmitting, silver-on-black co-extruded polyethylene, white-on-black co-extruded polyethylene and a bare soil control) with and without an agrotextile low tunnel were tested. For midseason production, the same mulch treatments were evaluated in combination with normal and high planting densities (54 400 plants ha -1 and 65 200 plants ha -1 ). Low tunnels combined with mulches accelerated early growth and maturity by 10 d for infrared-transmitting mulch, 7–8 d for silver mulch and 3–5 d for white mulch, relative to production on bare soil control without a low tunnel. Infrared-transmitting mulch alone increased plant biomass early in the season and produced a lettuce head of heavier or similar weight relative to that from bare soil, even if harvested 3–4 d earlier. Lettuce heads grown on silver and white mulches were harvested 1–3 d earlier, and were 22% heavier in the first year and 29% heavier in the second year than when grown on bare soil. Head weights of lettuce under the low tunnels were higher than those from control plots in the first year only, and head size was similar in both years. For midseason production, infrared-transmitting and silver mulches accelerated the early growth of lettuce, but resulted in heads with long cores at maturity, particularly with infrared-transmitting mulch. Silver mulch increased the percentage of marketable heads in the first year and head weight and size at maturity in the second year, and reduced the incidence of aphids in both years, relative to plots without mulch. White mulch resulted in larger and heavier heads than those produced without mulch in the second year, and produced heads with shorter cores than those produced with other mulches in both years, even during particularly hot growing conditions. The percentage of marketable heads was similar for both the high- and low-density plantings and, as a result, the former produced more marketable heads per hectare. However, lettuce plants grown at the higher density were smaller in the second year. During conditions conducive to disease development in the first year, higher density plantings were more susceptible to downy mildew. Key words: Lactuca sativa, iceberg lettuce, muck soils, plasticulture, mini-tunnel, physiological disorder, planting densities

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it