MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2090746660 · doi:10.4141/p02-194

Plastic mulches and row covers for early and midseason crisphead lettuce produced on organic soils

2003· article· en· W2090746660 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Sylvie Jenni, J.-F. Dubuc, K.A. Stewart

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicIrrigation Practices and Water Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsMulchAgronomyPlastic mulchSowingSoil waterLactucaHorticultureEnvironmental scienceBiologySoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plastic mulches and row covers for early and midseason crisphead lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. ‘Ithaca’) grown on organic soils were investigated over 2 yr. For early production, four mulch treatments (infrared transmitting, silver-on-black co-extruded polyethylene, white-on-black co-extruded polyethylene and a bare soil control) with and without an agrotextile low tunnel were tested. For midseason production, the same mulch treatments were evaluated in combination with normal and high planting densities (54 400 plants ha-1 and 65 200 plants ha-1). Low tunnels combined with mulches accelerated early growth and maturity by 10 d for infrared-transmitting mulch, 7–8 d for silver mulch and 3–5 d for white mulch, relative to production on bare soil control without a low tunnel. Infrared-transmitting mulch alone increased plant biomass early in the season and produced a lettuce head of heavier or similar weight relative to that from bare soil, even if harvested 3–4 d earlier. Lettuce heads grown on silver and white mulches were harvested 1–3 d earlier, and were 22% heavier in the first year and 29% heavier in the second year than when grown on bare soil. Head weights of lettuce under the low tunnels were higher than those from control plots in the first year only, and head size was similar in both years. For midseason production, infrared-transmitting and silver mulches accelerated the early growth of lettuce, but resulted in heads with long cores at maturity, particularly with infrared-transmitting mulch. Silver mulch increased the percentage of marketable heads in the first year and head weight and size at maturity in the second year, and reduced the incidence of aphids in both years, relative to plots without mulch. White mulch resulted in larger and heavier heads than those produced without mulch in the second year, and produced heads with shorter cores than those produced with other mulches in both years, even during particularly hot growing conditions. The percentage of marketable heads was similar for both the high- and low-density plantings and, as a result, the former produced more marketable heads per hectare. However, lettuce plants grown at the higher density were smaller in the second year. During conditions conducive to disease development in the first year, higher density plantings were more susceptible to downy mildew. Key words: Lactuca sativa, iceberg lettuce, muck soils, plasticulture, mini-tunnel, physiological disorder, planting densities

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2003
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicIrrigation Practices and Water ManagementFrench-language works237,207