In vitro and ex vivo Activities of CY216: Comparison with Other Low Molecular Weight Heparins
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Low molecular weight (LMW) heparins achieve their anticoagulant effects by inhibiting prothrombin activation, catalyzing endogenous thrombin inhibition, and binding thrombin. The extent of which each of the three actions of LMW heparins contributes to the antithrombotic effectiveness of LMW in man has not been defined. Several studies have reported that ex vivo anti-factor Xa activities of LMW heparins correlate with efficacy and potential haemorrhagic complications. However, critical review of the data suggests that anti-factor Xa assays are basically surrogate tests for the mass of LMW heparins in patients' plasmas rather than reliable estimates of total catalytic concentrations of LMW heparins. Antithrombotic effectiveness of LMW heparins probably reflects their ability to inhibit coagulation in vivo. If the last concept proves correct, then results of tests which directly assess the extents to which LMW heparins have suppressed in vivo coagulation may provide more reliable markers for their antithrombotic effectiveness or lack thereof.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it