MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091105613 · doi:10.1143/ptps.146.212

Neutrino Burst from Supernovae and Neutrino Oscillation

2002· article· en· W2091105613 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress of Theoretical Physics Supplement · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsNeutrinoNeutrino oscillationSupernovaPhysicsMeasurements of neutrino speedSolar neutrino problemParticle physicsOscillation (cell signaling)AstronomySolar neutrinoAstrophysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neutrino bursts from core-collapse driven supernovae are the most luminous neutrino sources in the universe. If neutrinos have finite masses and convert each other, the time profile and energy spectrum of the burst are greatly modified. We review how this conversion happens in a supernova mantle, and how the burst will be detected by SK (Super-Kamiokande) and SNO (Sudbury Neutrino Observatory) if a supernova appears at the Galactic center. We show that the degeneracy of the solar neutrino problem can be broken by the combination of the SK and SNO detections of a future Galactic supernova. We also discuss effects of neutrino oscillation on the determination of the supernova direction by neutrino observations, and on the supernova relic neutrino observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it