MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Experimental Study of Offset HSS Connections

2006· article· en· W2091364986 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Structural Engineering · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsCanadian Wood CouncilDalhousie UniversityUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChord (peer-to-peer)Structural engineeringTrussFlangeDiagonalWeldingOffset (computer science)PlanarFailure mode and effects analysisMaterials scienceMathematicsEngineeringGeometryComposite materialComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The structural behavior of welded hollow structural sections (HSS) connections in which one member is laterally offset from the plane of a connection is investigated experimentally and compared with corresponding planar connections. Sixteen full-scale test connections, consisting of either T or N configurations fabricated from class C HSS, were tested at load levels comparable with those expected to occur in actual trusses. In all cases the mode of failure was by localized large deflections of the flange face and sidewalls of the compression chord. It was found that in the case of T connections, the reduction in capacity due to offsetting a member by as much as 17% of the width of the chord member from the central plane of the truss was marginal. N configurations, whose diagonal members were offset by 8% of the width of the chord member, showed a slight increase in ultimate strength. The design values obtained using both AISC LRFD and CIDECT specifications are compared with the test results where appropriate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score0.669

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it