MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091649374 · doi:10.2113/jeeg11.3.197

Neural Network Based Interpretation Algorithm for Combined Induced Polarization and Vertical Electrical Soundings of Coastal Zones

2006· article· en· W2091649374 on OpenAlexaff
Rambhatla G. Sastry, Haile G. Tesfakiros

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsVictoria Park
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVertical electrical soundingInduced polarizationGeologyElectrical resistivity and conductivityAquiferDepth soundingArtificial neural networkGeophysicsBathymetryGroundwaterMineralogyGeotechnical engineeringArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceOceanographyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The problem of fresh water availability in coastal aquifers is a reality. For in-situ and dynamic characterization of seawater encroachment into coastal aquifers, electrical geophysical methods are better suited. Vertical Electrical sounding (VES) when combined with induced polarization soundings (IPS) can resolve saline sands from moist clays. Our feed forward back-propagation neural network (BPNN) based approach automates the analysis of combined vertical electrical and induced polarization soundings to suit practical needs. Our method is initially tested on synthetic data computed from available geo-electric sections and geological information concerning coastal aquifers of the East Coast of India. The synthetic data comprised 18 combined Schlumberger IPS and VES soundings (504 apparent resistivity and chargeability samples) spread over five profiles in the study region. Fictitious apparent resistivity (product of apparent resistivity and apparent chargeability) soundings are derived from them. We used 118 carefully selected discrete fictitious apparent resistivity values from 210 sample sets gathered from 15 (420 samples) combined soundings to train the BPNN, while 33 samples from 3 separate combined soundings, and 26 random samples from 92 unused training samples of 15 soundings were used for testing. Our trained BPNN involved one input node and one bias-unit at the input layer stage, one node in the output layer, and 18 nodes and one bias-unit in hidden layer. The trained neural net showed an overall success rate of 83% in testing phase for distinguishing clays from saline sands in the synthetic example. Our method is also tested on real data concerning a shaly groundwater aquifer in Bahia, Brazil yielding an overall accuracy of 85%, quite comparable to that of synthetic case. Thus, both synthetic and field data analysis validate our neural network based algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental and Engineering GeophysicsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207