MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091727064 · doi:10.1109/sips.2006.352584

Fixed-to-Variable Length Source Coding Using Turbo Codes

2006· article· en· W2091727064 on OpenAlexaff
Javad Haghighat, Walaa Hamouda, Mohammad Soleymani

Bibliographic record

VenueSiPS ... design and implementation - IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPuncturingTurbo codeComputer scienceEntropy encodingAlgorithmLossless compressionDistributed source codingEncoderVariable-length codeContext-adaptive binary arithmetic codingSource codeData compressionTheoretical computer scienceDecoding methodsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lossless turbo source coding with decremental redundancy is an effective approach for compressing binary sources. A large block length lossless turbo source encoder offers compression rates close to the source entropy, but with large latency. In this note, we propose a lossless compression technique for binary memory less sources using short block length turbo codes. To achieve compression rates close to the source entropy, we modify different components of the encoder. We focus on the design of the parity interleaver for different compression rates. Also, we replace the square shape puncturing array with a rectangular shape array that allows finer puncturing and hence improved compression rates. Finally, instead of a single code, we employ many codes operating in parallel. Given these modifications, we evaluate the encoding complexity of the proposed code

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSiPS ... design and implementation - IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing SystemsSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207