MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2091819060 · doi:10.1109/mwc.2013.6704481

Neighbor discovery algorithms in directional antenna based synchronous and asynchronous wireless ad hoc networks

2013· article· en· W2091819060 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNeighbor Discovery ProtocolAsynchronous communicationWireless ad hoc networkAlgorithmNode (physics)Computer networkDirectional antennaDistributed computingWirelessAntenna (radio)TelecommunicationsThe Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The performance of wireless systems could be significantly improved by directional antennas with highly efficient MAC layers and other control protocols and algorithms. One such critical algorithm is neighbor discovery, which establishes links between adjacent neighboring nodes in the network. In this article, we first study the slotted synchronous system and propose a novel neighbor discovery algorithm to address the high collision problem caused by high node density. We then evaluate the performance of neighbor discovery algorithms and extend the results to asynchronous systems. Simulation results show that for the synchronous system, our algorithm consistently shortens the required time for the whole discovery process from that in previous works; for an asynchronous system, our algorithm sheds insight on how to select design parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it