Efficient Closed-Form Algorithms for AOA Based Self-Localization of Sensor Nodes Using Auxiliary Variables
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Node self-localization is a key research topic for wireless sensor networks (WSNs). There are two main algorithms, the triangulation method and the maximum likelihood (ML) estimator, for angle of arrival (AOA) based self-localization. The ML estimator requires a good initialization close to the true location to avoid divergence, while the triangulation method cannot obtain the closed-form solution with high efficiency. Here, we develop a set of efficient closed-form AOA based self-localization algorithms using auxiliary variables based methods. First, we formulate the self-localization problem as a linear least squares problem using auxiliary variables. Based on its closed-form solution, a new auxiliary variables based pseudo-linear estimator (AVPLE) is developed. By analyzing its estimation error, we present a bias compensated AVPLE (BCAVPLE) to reduce the estimation error. Then we develop a novel BCAVPLE based weighted instrumental variable (BCAVPLE-WIV) estimator to achieve asymptotically unbiased estimation of locations and orientations of unknown nodes based on prior knowledge of the AOA noise variance. In the case that the AOA noise variance is unknown, a new AVPLE based WIV (AVPLE-WIV) estimator is developed to localize the unknown nodes. Also, we develop an autonomous coordinate rotation method to overcome the tangent instability of the proposed algorithms when the orientation of the unknown node is near$\pi/2$. We also derive the Cramér-Rao lower bound of the ML estimator. Extensive simulations demonstrate the new algorithms achieve much higher localization accuracy than the triangulation method and avoid local minima and divergence in iterative ML estimators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".