MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092384212 · doi:10.4000/clio.7303

Hérodote et Artémisia d’Halicarnasse

2008· article· fr· W2092384212 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueClio · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le point de vue d’Hérodote sur les guerres médiques, et particulièrement la bataille de Salamine en 480 avant notre ère, n’est pas totalement conforme à la bipolarisation grec/barbare, qui organise et hiérarchise les individus et les groupes vivant autour de la Méditerranée à l’époque classique. En effet Hérodote est un métis d’Halicarnasse en Asie mineure, et il s’amuse plutôt à décrire dans cet engagement naval la provocation d’Artémisia, reine de sa cité en 480. Celle-ci, également métissée, prouve qu’une cité grecque peut être dirigée par une femme, y compris à la guerre. Artémisia, particulièrement avisée, se conduit certes de façon déloyale mais avec une adresse telle que les dieux semblent avec elle. En adoptant le point de vue du métissage, celui d’Hérodote, il s’agit ici de montrer que l’épisode ne valide ni ne renverse la hiérarchie grec/barbare mais révèle les résistances d’une autre réalité grecque, celle d’un monde mélangé, où les femmes ne sont pas toujours soumises aux hommes suivant les critères de l’Athènes du ve siècle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it