Usages actuels du provençal dans la signalétique urbaine en Provence : motivations, significations et enjeux sociolinguistiques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les années 1990-2004 ont vu se développer de façon marquante une signalétique en provençal, souvent bilingue français-provençal, dans les villes de Provence (panneaux d’entrée de communes, noms de rues et de bâtiments administratifs, plaques touristiques et historiques, etc.). Les choix linguistiques et graphiques réalisés méritent analyse : les noms des communes affichés sont souvent une re-traduction en provençal du nom français officiel lui-même adapté – souvent maladroitement – à partir du toponyme historique en provençal local, les graphies hésitent entre plusieurs normes et plusieurs langues, les lieux retenus sont souvent symboliques, etc. Cette signalétique révèle la complexité et les tensions sociolinguistiques de la situation provençale (et plus largement française), ainsi que les problèmes auxquels se heurte toute tentative de réhabilitation linguistique et culturelle en situation de minoration et de contacts de langues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".