MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092590078 · doi:10.5539/mas.v9n1p12

Analysis of Active Clamp Fly Back Converter

2014· article· en· W2092590078 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInduction Heating and Inverter Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformerCapacitorClampingVoltageClamperVoltage spikeMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringComputer scienceReset (finance)TransistorForward converterControl theory (sociology)Boost converterEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes an active-clamp fly back dc-dc converter using an isolated transformer. This converter consists of two switches namely auxiliary and main switch. The auxiliary switch is mainly added to reduce the voltage ripples especially on the primary side of the isolated high frequency transformer. This in turn will reduce the voltage stress present at the main switch. Active clamping is done for the recycling of stored energy in the HT and also to ensure the ZVS operation. The voltage spikes during transistor turn off time are clamped by active clamping. The Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS) of the main switch is obtained mainly using the auxiliary switch and the clamp capacitor. Analysis of active clamped fly back converter is done for 120W. The analysis is done for various switching frequencies and delay values for proper core reset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it