The influence of schlieren on in situ optical measurements used for particle characterization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In pycnoclines, the density differences can cause light scattering —schlieren —even though only few particulate scatterers may be present. This may pose problems for the interpretation of results obtained with instruments relying on light scattering and transmission, for example the LISST (Laser In Situ Scattering and Transmissometry) particle sizer, and various cameras. Here, the influence of schlieren on in situ forward light scattering, beam attenuation and image analysis is evaluated using a LISST‐100 and a digital floc camera. Automated image analysis routines detect schlieren as particles, causing an apparent increase in particle size and volume. Re‐analysis omitting schlieren‐affected parts of the images reveals no increase. LISST beam attenuation and Volume Scattering Function (VSF) measurements indicate that schlieren can cause increases in beam attenuation due to a marked increase in the VSF at angles smaller than ~1.5°‐2°, and falsely indicate accumulation of suspended particles in the pycnocline. Light scattering caused by density differences can also cause multiple scattering, which produces an apparent decrease in particle size derived from the LISST. Schlieren is visible in images when the buoyancy frequency exceeds ~0.12 s −1 . Buoyancy frequencies above 0.025 s −1 may cause increases in beam attenuation due to scattering from the density gradients and complete extinction of beam transmission can occur at buoyancy frequencies above ~0.20 s −1 . All instruments measuring light scattering can potentially be affected by density differences, and results obtained in waters where buoyancy frequencies exceeds 0.025 s −1 should be interpreted carefully.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it