Quand lire, c’est écouter. Le livre sonore et ses enjeux lecturaux
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À l’oeuvre sonore correspondent deux figures de lecteurs : celles des lecteur-performeur et lecteur-auditeur. C’est en fonction des composantes singulières d’une mise en lecture que cet article vise à entamer une réflexion sur le rôle de chacun de ces agents dans la réception du texte enregistré. Le lecteur-auditeur se trouve dans une situation bien particulière de réception du texte littéraire, celle de l’écoute et par conséquent, de l’absence de support écrit. Son rapport au texte se construit simultanément à celui de la voix du lecteur-performeur. Dès lors, l’oeuvre sonore implique d’envisager la lecture en fonction de la réception de la voix. Une étude de cas, celle de L’inceste de Christine Angot, permet de relever la nature des difficultés interprétatives que peut poser le passage d’un texte écrit à un format sonore.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".