MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2092925171 · doi:10.1177/1090820x12438896

Venous Thromboembolism in Abdominoplasty: A Comprehensive Approach to Lower Procedural Risk

2012· article· en· W2092925171 on OpenAlexaff
Ron B. Somogyi, Jamil Ahmad, Jessica G. Shih, Frank Lista

Bibliographic record

VenueAesthetic Surgery Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBody Contouring and Surgery
Canadian institutionsResearch CanadaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAbdominoplastyPerioperativeCompression stockingsSurgeryDeep veinIntermittent pneumatic compressionComplicationThrombosisVenous thromboembolismPulmonary embolismVenous stasisPlastic surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious and potentially life-threatening surgical complication. However, there is little consensus regarding appropriate VTE prophylaxis for plastic surgery patients. Risk factors as they apply to plastic surgery patients are unclear, and recent recommendations for chemoprophylaxis in these patients may expose them to other additional risks. OBJECTIVES: The authors examine perioperative and intraoperative measures, specifically those that have enabled a large number of patients to undergo outpatient abdominoplasty safely, with a reduced risk of VTE. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 404 consecutive abdominoplasty patients who were treated at a single outpatient surgery center between 2000 and 2010. Graded compression stockings and intermittent pneumatic compression devices were placed on all patients, and perioperative and intraoperative warming was strictly applied. Progressive tension suturing technique was performed in all cases and drains were eliminated. All patients received pain pumps, ambulated within one hour of surgery, and were discharged home the same day. Patient VTE risk factors were scored with the Caprini/Davison risk assessment model (RAM). Perioperative and intraoperative measures were taken to reduce factors that may increase VTE risk in abdominoplasty. Complications were recorded, including VTE events, seromas, hematomas, and infections. RESULTS: In this series, 247 abdominoplasty procedures were performed alone and 157 were combined with additional procedures. Under the RAM, 297 patients were considered "high risk" and 17 "highest risk." Abdominoplasty operative time was 100 ± 29 minutes. Only one case of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) occurred, in the calf. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive approach to perioperative and intraoperative patient care has allowed outpatient abdominoplasty to be safely performed without VTE chemoprophylaxis in patients with fewer than six risk factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAesthetic Surgery JournalSame topicBody Contouring and SurgeryFrench-language works237,207