Flexible citizens? Transnationalism and citizenship amongst economic immigrants in Vancouver
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper contributes to current theoretical debates surrounding concepts of transnationalism and citizenship through an in‐depth, qualitative analysis of ‘astronaut families’ and ‘satellite kids’ in Vancouver, Canada. Specifically, it asks whether the emergence of these ostensibly transnational households amongst Hong Kong and Taiwanese groups indicates a form of ‘instrumental citizenship’( Ip, Inglis and Wu 1997 ). The circumstances surrounding these family arrangements indeed point to a strategic use of migration, wherein one or both adults planned prior to emigration that they would return, imminently, to the country of origin to work, optimising financial opportunities. The children would remain in Vancouver to obtain an education, during which time the family would be able to acquire Canadian citizenship. Such depictions of a strategising, ‘hypermobile’( Skeldon 1995 ) Chinese cohort fail, however, to capture an important aspect of the transnational experience, wherein research participants clearly undergo settlement over time and, for want of a better term, a degree of acculturation. This paper suggests that the ‘mobility’ of the Chinese diaspora has been often over emphasised in recent accounts of contemporary migration patterns, too hastily rejecting outright traditional conceptions of immigrant settlement experience .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".