MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093238235 · doi:10.1080/17493460600658318

Translations: Artifacts from an Actor-Network Perspective

2007· article· en· W2093238235 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArtifact · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusic History and Culture
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEphemeral keyMalleabilityPerspective (graphical)Computer scienceActor–network theoryEveryday lifeCognitive scienceData scienceSociologyEpistemologyArtificial intelligencePsychologySocial scienceComputer securityPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

iPods, MP3s and file-sharing networks performa series of actions that are often reserved forhuman agents, such as the intellectual and tastedrivenlabor involved in selecting, sequencing, andrediscovering forgotten sound recordings. At thesame time, the familiar understanding of artifactsas stable, material, objective things “out there”is also being eroded by the infinite replicability,malleability, and ephemeral flickering of thingsonline. These trends lead to questions regardingthe ontological status of artifacts and reopenthe question of how to distinguish technicaland material artifacts from human and socialrelations. In this article, the author explores actornetworktheory’s (ANT) concept of translation,which advances an alternative framework forunderstanding the role of artifacts in everyday life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it