Sense & Sensation: the Act of Mediation and its Effects
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
What happens when we mediate? What are the effects of mediation on the body? Are we being altered by technology? This article examines the unique occurrence of cross-model perception found to be associated with moments of acute kinaesonic expression in real-time interactive digital performance. The function and significance of cross-model perception is discussed in the light of the author’s practice with the Bodycoder System and new research into bodily self-consciousness and the sensory effects of new technology within the area of the neurosciences. Empirical findings are framed by a broader theoretical discussion that draws on John Cage’s notion of organicity and Gilles Deleuze’s sensual description of seizure, in opposition to telecommunication’s threat to the morphological stability of reality proposed by Paul Virilio. The article argues that cross-model perceptions, sensory mislocations, compensatory and synaesthesic effects of increasingly intimate and significant couplings of humans and technologies may not, as feared, represent a loss or disruption of perceptual reality, but rather indicate the register of a hitherto unconscious human facility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it