Fast Mode Selection for HEVC Intra-Frame Coding With Entropy Coding Refinement Based on a Transparent Composite Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In comparison with H.264/Advanced Video Coding, the newest video coding standard, High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC), improves video coding rate-distortion (RD) performance, but at the price of significant increase in its encoding complexity, especially, in intra-mode decision due to the adoption of more complex block partitions and more candidate intra-prediction modes (IPMs). To reduce the mode decision complexity in HEVC intra-frame coding, while maintaining its RD performance, in this paper, we first formulate the mode decision problem in intra-frame coding as a Bayesian decision problem based on the newly proposed transparent composite model (TCM) for discrete cosine transform coefficients, and then present an outlier-based fast intra-mode decision (OIMD) algorithm. The proposed OIMD algorithm reduces the complexity using outliers identified by TCM to make a fast coding unit split/nonsplit decision and reduce the number of IPMs to be compared. To further take advantage of the outlier information furnished by TCM, we also refine entropy coding in HEVC by encoding the outlier information first, and then the actual mode decision conditionally given the outlier information. The proposed OIMD algorithm can work with and without the proposed entropy coding refinement. Experiments show that for the all-intra-main test configuration of HEVC: 1) when applied alone, the proposed OIMD algorithm reduces, on average, the encoding time (ET) by 50% with 0.7% Bjontegaard distortion (BD)-rate increase and 2) when applied in conjunction with the proposed entropy coding refinement, it reduces, on average, both the ET by 50% and BD-rate by 0.15%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".