The effect of different surface topographies on the corrosion behaviour of nickel
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The electrochemical and corrosion behaviour of a surface is extremely complicated and depends on various chemical, physical and mechanical factors. In this study the effect of different surface roughnesses on the corrosion resistance of nickel in 0.5 M sulphuric acid was investigated. Open circuit potential, corrosion current density, polarization resistance and corrosion rate were measured for surfaces polished with different grits (120, 240, 400, 600 and 1200) of silicon carbide papers. The surface roughness was measured using a profilometry method both before and after corrosion testing. SEM images were taken and compared for all of the samples before and after corrosion tests. The results showed that surface roughness and surface morphology can considerably change corrosion and corrosion rate. A higher corrosion resistance is obtained for surfaces with lower roughnesses. Finally, the results were compared with specimens where a specific surface patterning was obtained using a laser ablation method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it