MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093815052 · doi:10.1080/17450910802295096

The<i>Internet Shakespeare Editions</i>: Scholarly Shakespeare on the Web

2008· article· en· W2093815052 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueShakespeare · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe InternetVariety (cybernetics)Context (archaeology)World Wide WebAnnotationHistoryComputer scienceMedia studiesSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Internet Shakespeare Editions (ISE) were founded in 1996, with a mission to make Shakespeare's works freely available in scholarly, multimedia, Internet editions. This article discusses the three main areas in which the ISE publishes: the texts themselves, records of performance and the context of Shakespeare's life and the social and intellectual climate of the time. Both opportunities and challenges are presented by the new medium: the encyclopaedic depth of data means that there is a need for intuitive signals to permit navigation between text, facsimile, annotation and performance; there is a need for data structures that will not render scholarly work obsolete over time; there is an opportunity to record some of the variety of Shakespeare on stage and film, but there are difficulties in dealing with issues of copyright. In the future, the site will become more interactive as, for example, visitors will be able to record reviews of current productions of the plays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it