MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2093818866 · doi:10.1109/icmew.2014.6890685

A video encoding speed-up architecture for cloud gaming

2014· article· en· W2093818866 on OpenAlexaff
Mehdi Semsarzadeh, Mahdi Hemmati, Abbas Javadtalab, Abdulsalam Yassine, Shervin Shirmohammadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEncoderCloud computingVideo trackingVideo gameEncoding (memory)Rendering (computer graphics)ServerUSableMultimediaReal-time computingVideo processingComputer visionArtificial intelligenceComputer networkOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In cloud-based video gaming systems, game engines are hosted in the cloud, and rendered gaming scenes are streamed to players over the Internet. In such systems, the tasks of rendering graphics and video encoding impose huge computational complexity on cloud servers. Therefore, speeding up the encoding process to meet the stringent requirements of the game becomes a critical issue in cloud-based video gaming systems. In this paper, we analyze the feasibility of developing a mechanism to accelerate the power-intensive process of video encoding, by using available game objects information in game engines. Specifically, we utilize the game engine's information about the motion of the objects within the scene in order to bypass the time-consuming procedure of Motion Estimation (ME) in conventional video encoders like H.264/AVC. Based on our analysis, the game engine's information could be usable inside a video encoder if an interface is involved to re-shape object information and make them compatible for the video encoder. Our experiments show that our approach accelerates the motion estimation process by 14.32% on average for two specific games, when object's information is taken into account during the encoding phase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207