MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094171535 · doi:10.1049/ip-vis:20045231

Optimum time–frequency distribution for detecting a discrete-time chirp signal in noise

2006· article· en· W2094171535 on OpenAlexaff
A. Yasotharan, T. Thayaparan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEE Proceedings - Vision Image and Signal Processing · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsDepartment of National Defence
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChirpAlgorithmSIGNAL (programming language)MathematicsNoise (video)Additive white Gaussian noiseTime–frequency analysisTime domainGaussian noiseGaussianDiscrete-time signalWigner distribution functionDetection theoryWhite noiseDiscrete frequency domainComputer scienceFrequency domainStatisticsSignal transfer functionMathematical analysisArtificial intelligenceRadarAnalog signalPhysicsTelecommunicationsDetectorOpticsComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the continuous-time domain, maximum-likelihood (ML) detection of a chirp signal in white Gaussian noise can be done by maximising (with respect to signal parameter arguments) the line-integral transform (LIT) of the classical Wigner distribution (of the observed signal). The LIT is known variously as the Hough transform and the Radon transform. For discrete-time signals, the Wigner-type distribution defined by Claasen and Mecklenbrauker has become popular as a signal analysis tool. Moreover, it is commonly believed that ML detection of a discrete-time chirp signal in independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) Gaussian noise can be done by maximising the LIT of the Wigner–Claasen–Mecklenbrauker distribution (WCMD). This belief is false and results in loss of performance. The authors derive a Wigner-type distribution for discrete-time signals such that ML detection of a discrete-time chirp signal in i.i.d. Gaussian noise can be done by maximising the LIT of this distribution. Simulated receiver operating curves showing the performance advantage of the new method over the WCMD-based method are provided. The signal parameter values that maximise the LIT are taken as estimates of the actual parameters. The authors provide simulation results showing that the parameter estimates obtained using the new method are more accurate than those obtained using the WCMD-based method. For the WCMD-based method, the range of unambiguously measurable frequencies (RUMF) is [−π/2, π/2]. For the new method, the RUMF is [−π, π].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEE Proceedings - Vision Image and Signal ProcessingSame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207