MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Factors Affecting Early Surgical Intervention After Uterine Artery Embolization

2002· review· en· W2094192892 on OpenAlexaff
Haya Al-Fozan, Togas Tulandi

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUterine Myomas and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUterine artery embolizationMyomaUterine arteryHysterectomyUterine myomaEmbolizationUterine fibroidsSurgeryRadiologyUterusPregnancyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is an effective technique for the management of uterine myoma. However, complications of this procedure can be serious, including uterine infection and bowel necrosis in conjunction with necrosis of subserous or pedunculated myomas. Treatment failure is more likely to occur in the presence of submucosal myoma associated with a uterine infection or a large myoma of more than 8 cm. Accordingly, patients whose primary symptoms include submucosal myoma and menorrhagia are best treated with a hysteroscopic myomectomy or hysterectomy. The role of the gynecologist is crucial for most effective management and safe use of uterine artery embolization. TARGET AUDIENCE: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After completion of this article, the reader will be able to list the complications of uterine artery embolization for fibroids, to describe postembolization syndrome, and identify the myomas that are more likely to fail uterine artery embolization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrical & Gynecological SurveySame topicUterine Myomas and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207