MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Factors Affecting Early Surgical Intervention After Uterine Artery Embolization

2002· review· en· W2094192892 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUterine Myomas and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUterine artery embolizationMyomaUterine arteryHysterectomyUterine myomaEmbolizationUterine fibroidsSurgeryRadiologyUterusPregnancyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is an effective technique for the management of uterine myoma. However, complications of this procedure can be serious, including uterine infection and bowel necrosis in conjunction with necrosis of subserous or pedunculated myomas. Treatment failure is more likely to occur in the presence of submucosal myoma associated with a uterine infection or a large myoma of more than 8 cm. Accordingly, patients whose primary symptoms include submucosal myoma and menorrhagia are best treated with a hysteroscopic myomectomy or hysterectomy. The role of the gynecologist is crucial for most effective management and safe use of uterine artery embolization. TARGET AUDIENCE: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After completion of this article, the reader will be able to list the complications of uterine artery embolization for fibroids, to describe postembolization syndrome, and identify the myomas that are more likely to fail uterine artery embolization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it