MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094289947 · doi:10.1515/mfir.2000.118

Micrographics: A Quarter-Century Perspective

2000· article· en· W2094289947 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroform and Imaging Review · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Retrieval and Data Mining
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroformQuarter (Canadian coin)Government (linguistics)TelecommunicationsVideotexInformation storageEngineeringBusinessLibrary scienceComputer scienceHistoryArchaeologyDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Micrographics once served the world of banking, finance and government. Microfilm was the medium. Since then, the micropublishing world has turned its attention to higher education and has devised a variety of formats: microcards, microprint, 16 and 35 millimeter microfilm, microfiche and ultrafiche to capture that market during a quarter-century period. Micrographics has responded to the information explosion that triggered the technology revolution which drives much of the world's economy. Developments in electrical engineering and the electronics industry gave contemporary society the semiconductor which revolutionized the storage, retrieval and dissemination of information, an issue of vital importance to the library profession. Developments in communication technology brought about by fiber optics and speedier microprocessors followed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it