MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094312985 · doi:10.1109/tap.2013.2247373

FDTD Method on a Lebedev Grid for Anisotropic Materials

2013· article· en· W2094312985 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite-difference time-domain methodGridClassification of discontinuitiesStencilLossy compressionComputer scienceAnisotropyDispersion relationMathematical analysisMathematicsComputational sciencePhysicsGeometryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The finite-difference time-domain method is derived on a Lebedev grid for lossy anisotropic media. The Lebedev grid uses collocated field components and supports spurious solutions but an intuitive method for removing the extra solutions is presented. Update equations at material discontinuities and metal planes are derived and shown to take the same form as updates in bulk media. Additionally, a dispersion relation and stability criteria are presented. A numerical comparison with the Yee grid shows that the Lebedev grid suffers from greater numerical dispersion but better represents material discontinuities when compared using equal memory requirements. Furthermore, the small stencil on the Lebedev grid decreases the required number of calls to memory and simplifies the programming structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it