MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094517420 · doi:10.1080/00220270802036643

Curriculum and the idea of a cosmopolitan inheritance

2008· article· en· W2094517420 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Curriculum Studies · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Education and Schools
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInheritance (genetic algorithm)CurriculumSociologyMathematics educationPedagogyCurriculum developmentPsychologyGeneticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The ancient idea of cosmopolitanism is a topic of renewed interest today. Scholars and practitioners in many fields are examining what it means to conceive all human beings as linked by their membership in a shared cosmos. Some people focus on political cosmopolitanism, others on moral, cultural, or economic cosmopolitanism. This paper examines educational cosmopolitanism by elucidating the idea of curriculum as a cosmopolitan inheritance. It argues that curriculum can generate a cosmopolitan sensibility, by which one means an outlook that regards life experience as universally educational. It suggests that a cosmopolitan sensibility can assist people in working through some of the tensions that accompany global and local change in our time. It can position them to reconstruct creatively cultural and individual values rather than abandon them in the face of the ceaseless pressure of globalization. A cosmopolitan sensibility edifies human beings by helping them perceive why all persons, in principle, can be creative guardians and practitioners of creativity itself. Keywords: cosmopolitanismcritical inheritancemeaning‐makingcurriculumsensibility Acknowledgements My thanks to Stephanie Burdick‐Shepherd for her artful and indispensable bibliographic assistance; to Jeff Frank and Avi Mintz for their close reading and criticism of the manuscript; to René V. Arcilla and Megan Laverty for many valuable conversations surrounding the cosmopolitan; to an anonymous reviewer for several important criticisms; and to audiences who raised useful questions in response to earlier versions of the essay I presented at the University of Humanistics in Utrecht (2004), the University of Manitoba (2004), the University of Kyoto (2005), Teachers College (2007), and the annual meeting of the Association for Moral Education, New York City (2007). Notes 1. See e.g. Burbules and Torres (2000 Burbules, N. C. and Torres, C. A., eds. 2000. Globalization and Education: Critical Perspectives, New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]). 2. See e.g. Sen (2006 Sen, A. 2006. Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny, New York: W. W. Norton. [Google Scholar]). 3. See Carter (2001 Carter, A. 2001. The Political Theory of Global Citizenship, London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]), Lu (2000 Lu, C. 2000. The one and many faces of cosmopolitanism. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 8(2): 244–267. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]), and Waldron (2000 Waldron, J. 2003. "Teaching cosmopolitan right". In Education and Citizenship in Liberal‐Democratic Societies: Teaching for Cosmopolitan Values and Collective Identities, Edited by: McDonough, K. and Feinberg, W. 23–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], 2003). 4. See Brennan (2005 Brennan, T. 2005. The Stoic Life: Emotions, Duties, and Fate, Oxford: Clarendon Press. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]), Long (2006 Long, A. A. 2006. From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]), Nussbaum (1994 Nussbaum, M. C. 1994. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]), and Reydams‐Schils (2005 Reydams‐Schils, G. 2005. The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]). 5. See Gunesch (2004 Gunesch, K. 2004. Education for cosmopolitanism? Cosmopolitanism as a personal cultural identity model for and within international education. Journal of Research in International Education, 3(3): 251–275. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]), Hill (2000 Hill, J. 2000. Becoming a Cosmopolitan: What it Means to be a Human Being in the New Millennium, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. [Google Scholar]), Hollinger (2002 Hollinger, D. A. 2002. "Not universalists, not pluralists: the new cosmopolitans find their own way". In Conceiving Cosmopolitanism: Theory, Context, and Practice, Edited by: Vertovec, S. and Cohen, R. 227–239. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]), Rizvi (2005 Rizvi, F. 2005. Identity, culture and cosmopolitan futures. Higher Education Policy, 18(4): 331–339. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]), and Waldron (2000 Waldron, J. 2003. "Teaching cosmopolitan right". In Education and Citizenship in Liberal‐Democratic Societies: Teaching for Cosmopolitan Values and Collective Identities, Edited by: McDonough, K. and Feinberg, W. 23–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], 2003). 6. See also Calhoun (2007 Calhoun, C. 2007. Nations Matter: Culture, History, and the Cosmopolitan Dream, New York: Routledge. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]). 7. See e.g. Benhabib (2006 Benhabib, S. 2006. Another Cosmopolitanism, Edited by: Post, R. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]) and Scheffler (2001 Scheffler, S. 2001. Boundaries and Allegiances: Problems of Justice and Responsibility in Liberal Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]: 111–130). 8. See also Earle and Cvetkovich (1995 Earle, T. C. and Cvetkovich, G. T. 1995. Social Trust: Toward a Cosmopolitan Society, Westport, CT: Praeger. [Google Scholar]: 102, 158, 180–181). 9. Tully (1995 Tully, J. 1995. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]) provides examples, from the point of view of constitution making, of what it can mean to learn authentically from minority communities under threat. The Crow experience also sheds light on why cosmopolitan practices can constitute something other than merely an effect, instrument, or expression of power. For a contrary perspective, see Popkewitz et al. (2006 Popkewitz, T. S., Olsson, U. and Petersson, K. 2006. The learning society, the unfinished cosmopolitan, and governing education, public health and crime prevention at the beginning of the twenty‐first century. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(4): 431–449. [Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]). In my view their Foucault‐inspired analysis too hastily conflates the cosmopolitan with what has been called neoliberalism. 10. See Held (2002 Held, D. 2002. World Citizenship: Cosmopolitan Thinking and its Opponents, London: Continuum. [Google Scholar]: 154–179) and Nussbaum (1997a Nussbaum, M. C. 1997a. Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]). 11. See also Anderson (1998 Anderson, A. 1998. "Cosmopolitanism, universalism, and the divided legacies of modernity". In Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling Beyond the Nation, Edited by: Cheah, P. and Robbins, B. 265–289. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar]: 289). 12. As mentioned previously, in the Western tradition of cosmopolitanism the Cynic philosopher Diogenes (4th century BCE) is credited with rendering the idea public when he went around declaring he was a citizen of the world (kosmopolites). I think there was something obscure, misleading, and out of balance in that proclamation, though this criticism does not mean he should have publicly said he is only a citizen of a particular polity. The cosmopolitan points to existential spaces that are neither 'purely' universal nor 'purely' local but rather feature a dynamic fusion that is also always more than a mere sum of the parts. 13. See also Appiah (2006 Appiah, K. A. 2006. Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers, New York: W. W. Norton. [Google Scholar]) and Cohen (1992 Cohen, M. 1992. Rooted cosmopolitanism: thoughts on the Left, nationalism, and multiculturalism. Dissent, 39(4): 478–483. [Google Scholar]). 14. For discussion, see Laverty (2007 Laverty, M. 2007. Iris Murdoch's Ethics: A Consideration of her Romantic Vision, London: Continuum. [Google Scholar]). 15. See also Hansen (2001 Hansen, D. T. 2001. Exploring the Moral Heart of Teaching: Toward a Teacher's Creed, New York: Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar]: 167–191). 16. See e.g. Banks (2004 Banks, J. A., ed. 2004. Diversity and Citizenship Education: Global Perspectives, San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass. [Google Scholar]), Gaudelli (2003 Gaudelli, W. 2003. World Class: Teaching and Learning in Global Times, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]), Noddings (2005 Noddings, N., ed. 2005. Educating Citizens for Global Awareness, New York: Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar]), Parker et al. (1999 Parker, W. C., Ninomiya, A. and Cogan, J. 1999. Educating 'world citizens': toward multinational curriculum development. American Educational Research Journal, 36(2): 117–145. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]), Pinar (2003 Pinar, W. F., ed. 2003. International Handbook of Curriculum Research, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]), and Rohrs and Lenhart (1995 Rohrs, H. and Lenhart, V., eds. 1995. Progressive Education Across the Continents, New York: Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]). 17. See also Scheffler (2001 Scheffler, S. 2001. Boundaries and Allegiances: Problems of Justice and Responsibility in Liberal Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]: 122). 18. See e.g. Englund (2000 Englund, T. 2000. Rethinking democracy and education: towards an education of deliberative citizens. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2): 305–313. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], 2006 Englund, T. 2006. Deliberative communication: a pragmatist proposal. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(5): 503–520. [Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]) and Roth (2006 Roth, K. 2006. Deliberation in national and post‐national education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(5): 569–589. [Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]). 19. See e.g. Smith and Williams (1999 Smith, G. A. and Williams, D. R., eds. 1999. Ecological Education in Action: On Weaving Education, Culture, and the Environment, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. [Google Scholar]).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it