Microstructural investigation on marforming and conventional cold deformation in Ni–Ti–Fe-based shape memory alloys
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A hot-rolled Ni–Ti–Fe alloy was subjected to 50% cold rolling by laboratory rolling mill and was subsequently annealed at 800°C for 1.5 h. This sample was then deformed through another 10% reduction in thickness by two different routes (i) conventional cold rolling and (ii) marforming (rolling in liquid nitrogen) followed by annealing under identical conditions. The grain refinement during normal cold rolling was attributed to relatively large presence of dislocations in the ND // <110> grains in the starting microstructure. The regions of higher dislocation densities became gradually textured to ND // <111> orientation, with cold rolling. Marforming (deformation in liquid nitrogen following phase transformation) on the other hand led to more significant grain refinement and also change in the bulk texture. The objective of this study was to compare the grain refinement and microstructural modification produced through marforming with that obtained in conventional cold deformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it