MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2094724421 · doi:10.4153/cjm-2003-025-3

Integrable Systems Associated to a Hopf Surface

2003· article· en· W2094724421 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Mathematics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometry and complex manifolds
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsMathematicsHopf fibrationFibrationPure mathematicsVector bundleCotangent bundleDivisor (algebraic geometry)Integrable systemFrame bundlePrincipal bundleNormal bundleMathematical analysisGeometryHomotopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A Hopf surface is the quotient of the complex surface by an infinite cyclic group of dilations of . In this paper, we study the moduli spaces of stable -bundles on a Hopf surface , from the point of view of symplectic geometry. An important point is that the surface is an elliptic fibration, which implies that a vector bundle on can be considered as a family of vector bundles over an elliptic curve. We define a map that associates to every bundle on a divisor, called the graph of the bundle, which encodes the isomorphism class of the bundle over each elliptic curve. We then prove that the map G is an algebraically completely integrable Hamiltonian system, with respect to a given Poisson structure on . We also give an explicit description of the fibres of the integrable system. This example is interesting for several reasons; in particular, since the Hopf surface is not Kähler, it is an elliptic fibration that does not admit a section.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.669

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it