High Prevalence of Obstructive Sleep Apnea among Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients with cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx scheduled for primary surgical resection. To correlate the presence of OSA and the occurrence of postoperative morbidities in this patient population. METHODS: This was a prospective study involving 17 patients with malignancies of the oral cavity and oropharynx scheduled for primary surgical resection. Consecutive patients were approached to undergo overnight polysomnography to determine the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). OSA was defined by an AHI value > or = 20 events per hour. Postoperative morbidities were evaluated in a blinded fashion for the patients completing surgery. RESULTS: OSA was present in 13 of 17 patients, yielding a striking prevalence of 76% in this patient group. The mean AHI for patients with OSA was 44.7 +/- 3.5 (standard error) events per hour, with a mean nadir oxygen saturation of 88.2 +/- 1.8%, consistent with moderate to severe sleep-disordered breathing. The OSA and non-OSA patients were similar with respect to age and body mass index. The mean size of the primary tumour was 3.3 cm in patients with an AHI < 20 and 3.5 cm in those with an AHI > or = 20 (p = not significant). Overall, postoperative complications, defined as prolonged intensive care unit stay (> 24 hours), need for mechanical ventilation, and cardiopulmonary morbidities, were observed in 67% of OSA and 25% of non-OSA patients. CONCLUSIONS: These findings point to a strong association between OSA and malignancies of the oral cavity and oropharynx. This relationship was independent of the size of the primary malignancy in this patient population with tumours ranging from 1 to 7 cm (p = not significant). When comparing the two groups (AHI < 20 and AHI > or = 20), there was a tendency for the group with OSA to have an increase in postoperative morbidities. Further research is warranted to further evaluate the postoperative morbidities and mortalities associated with OSA in this patient population and to determine the potential roles for preoperative treatment with continuous positive airway pressure and tracheotomy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".