MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095174067 · doi:10.1177/0748730405280248

Are Modifications of Melatonin Circadian Rhythm in the Middle Years of Life Related to Habitual Patterns of Light Exposure?

2005· article· en· W2095174067 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Rhythms · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCircadian rhythm and melatonin
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMelatoninCircadian rhythmMorningRhythmMedicineBiological clockInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mechanisms underlying age-related changes in the signal from the biological clock have yet to be determined. The authors sought to determine if the phase advance of circadian melatonin rhythm during the middle years of life is related to different patterns of habitual light exposure. Forty-one healthy subjects between the ages of 22 and 58 y were studied. Habitual light exposure was measured by a wrist monitor for 7 days. Participants underwent a 25-h constant routine. They provided saliva samples every 30 min, and melatonin concentration was determined by radioimmunoassay to assess salivary dim light melatonin onset (S-DLMO(1.3)). Aging was associated with earlier S-DLMO(1.3). Increasing age was not related to the time spent at different light intensities. However, it was associated with lower percentage of light exposure during the night (between 0200-0400, 0600-0700, and 2300-2400 h) and with higher percentage of light exposure in the morning (between 0800-1100 h). Earlier S-DLMO(1.3) was associated with lower percentage of light exposure early on in the night (between 2200-0000, 0000-0100, and 0200-0300 h) as well as in the afternoon (between 1500-1600 h) and with higher percentage of light exposure in the morning (between 0800-1100 h). When the effects of age were controlled, there was no significant relationship between S-DLMO(1.3) and percentages of light exposure. Yet increasing age was associated with earlier S-DLMO(1.3) regardless of light exposure patterns. Earlier habitual wake time explained the earlier light exposure patterns of older subjects. Both habitual wake time and age contributed to the prediction of S-DLMO(1.3). The results suggest a phase advance of circadian rhythms in the middle years of life. Whereas a clear change in habitual light exposure patterns was associated with aging and with shifts in S-DLMO(1.3), it did not explain entirely the age-related advance of melatonin circadian phase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.576
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it