MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095459690 · doi:10.4153/cjm-2013-048-3

A Skolem–Mahler–Lech Theorem for Iterated Automorphisms of<i>K</i>–algebras

2013· article· en· W2095459690 on OpenAlexafffund
Jason P. Bell, Jeffrey C. Lagarias

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Mathematics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsAutomorphismIterated functionType (biology)Commutative propertyField (mathematics)Finite fieldScheme (mathematics)Algebraic numberSigmaDiscrete mathematicsPure mathematicsCombinatoricsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper we prove a commutative algebraic extension of a generalized Skolem–Mahler– Lech theorem. LetAbe a finitely generated commutativeK–algebra over a field of characteristic 0, and letσbe aK–algebra automorphism ofA. Given idealsIandJofA, we show that the setSof integersmsuch that Jis a finite union of complete doubly infinite arithmetic progressions inm, up to the addition of a finite set. Alternatively, this result states that for an affine schemeXof finite type overK, an automorphismσ∊ 2 AutK(X), andYandZany two closed subschemes ofX, the set of integersmwith Yis as above. We present examples showing that this result may fail to hold if the affine schemeXis not of finite type, or ifXis of finite type but the fieldKhas positive characteristic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MathematicsSame topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207