MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095459690 · doi:10.4153/cjm-2013-048-3

A Skolem–Mahler–Lech Theorem for Iterated Automorphisms of<i>K</i>–algebras

2013· article· en· W2095459690 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Mathematics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsAutomorphismIterated functionType (biology)Commutative propertyField (mathematics)Finite fieldScheme (mathematics)Algebraic numberSigmaDiscrete mathematicsPure mathematicsCombinatoricsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper we prove a commutative algebraic extension of a generalized Skolem–Mahler– Lech theorem. Let A be a finitely generated commutative K –algebra over a field of characteristic 0, and let σ be a K –algebra automorphism of A . Given ideals I and J of A , we show that the set S of integers m such that J is a finite union of complete doubly infinite arithmetic progressions in m , up to the addition of a finite set. Alternatively, this result states that for an affine scheme X of finite type over K , an automorphism σ ∊ 2 Aut K ( X ), and Y and Z any two closed subschemes of X , the set of integers m with Y is as above. We present examples showing that this result may fail to hold if the affine scheme X is not of finite type, or if X is of finite type but the field K has positive characteristic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.776

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it