MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095810414 · doi:10.5555/789083.1022812

Time Domain Multiplexed TAM: Implementation and Comparison

2003· article· en· W2095810414 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceReconfigurabilityScalabilityEmbedded systemOverhead (engineering)MultiplexingSystem on a chipComputer architectureTestabilityFlexibility (engineering)Domain (mathematical analysis)Network packetComputer networkEngineeringReliability engineeringOperating systemTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the difficult problems which core-based systemon -chip (SoC) designs face is test access. For testing the cores in a SoC, a special mechanism is required, since they are not directly accessible via chip inputs and outputs. In this paper we introduce a novel Test Access Mechanism (TAM) based on time domain multiplexing (TDM-TAM). This TAM is P1500 compatible and uses a P1500 wrapper. The TAM characteristics are its flexibility, scalability, and reconfigurability. The proposed TAM is compared with two other approaches: a serial threading approach analogous to the IEEE1149.1 standard (Serial TAM)[7]and a packetswitching test network (NIMA)[9]. A network-processing engine SoC is used as a platform to compare the different TAMs [6]. Results show that in most cases, TDM is the most effective TAM in both test time and overhead area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVLSI and Analog Circuit TestingFrench-language works237,207